John Marinatto Reaches Out to ACC, Big 12 Commissioners on Expansion
Big East commissioner John Marinatto has been openly active lately concerning the issue of conference expansion. Marinatto has been trying to save college football from turning into a free for all of BCS conferences picking apart each other or the other FBS conferences. Marinatto talked to CBS Sports about his intentions to help restore integrity to the collegiate model of football.
I suggested to both Dan Beebe and John Swofford that the Big East, Big 12 and ACC take the lead and meet face-to-face to collaborate in a manner that is consistent with Mark Emmert’s recent call for integrity within college athletics," Marinatto told CBSSports.com.
Is this call for the BCS commissioners to not pursue their own interests aggressively going to work? For the moment, any BCS conference not doing whatever it can to put itself in the best position to thrive and/or simply survive is being foolish. Beebe and Swofford said they are open to Marinatto's idea that the conferences, while being competitors, should find ways to work with each other for the good of the sport. Just wait till a member of the ACC or yet another member of the Big 12 actually gets picked off and see how they feel about being constructive.
In the article, the problem of not having a general college football commissioner is raised. We wanted to ask you about that issue and whether or not you think it would help the sport (the fact that this article was written in the wake of the Miami scandal was not intentional). If you have any thoughts about such a commissioner, drop those in the comments.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm not impressed
He’s trying to save is job. The Big East is the weakest of the AQ conferences, and has the least chance of survival due to the low level of football.
The better football schools, or the ones with the most potential (e.g., WVU, Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers) will be picked off by the stronger conferences, leaving the weak and the basketball schools by the side of the road.
Sound more like “what can I do to preserve the Providence patronage mill that is the current Big East”.
West Virginia fans hate everybody. They remember every snub and joke and bit of snark. And they never forgive, and they never, ever forget. In other words, they're a lot like West Virginians in general.
Rutgers?
You’re kidding right? They are not a good football school, so that must mean you think they have potential? If they have potential, then every school in the Big East has “potential.” Because there is nothing about that school that indicates any future consistent football success.
2011 National Champs in Men's Basketball
18-1
1967: Embrace it
Rutgers will get picked off before the bottom 4
Cincinnati, Louisville, USF, UConn. New York/North Jersey TV sets make them an addition to a conference network.
West Virginia fans hate everybody. They remember every snub and joke and bit of snark. And they never forgive, and they never, ever forget. In other words, they're a lot like West Virginians in general.
I'd argue that Tampa offers a pretty big market if we're talking TV sets.
One of the larger enrollments and alumni scattered through the Tampa Bay area and into Orlando. Not the biggest, but a good market as it is. Fairly sizable metropolitan area.
by The Bull Gator on Aug 17, 2011 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
New York/North Jersey TV sets make them an addition to a conference network.
That’s false.
No team carries the NY/NJ TV market. No one cares about college football in NYC.
Tbh, academics would actually be the reason they might get selected before the other four. The value of the Rutgers football program is minimal and about the same as UConn and Cincy. I would put Louisville and USF ahead in that one area myself.
2011 National Champs in Men's Basketball
18-1
1967: Embrace it
Just throwing this out there
When in the past did college football have integrity? Somebody make the case for me.

by 












